Legal Analytics for Consumer Protection
Lex Machina’s Legal Analytics for Consumer Protection Litigation enables attorneys and companies to make data-driven decisions about federal consumer protection case strategy and tactics. Now you can use quantified insights into the behavior of district court judges, opposing parties, and opposing counsel to gain competitive advantage in consumer protection litigation.
Lex Machina’s consumer protection data lets you analyze federal consumer protection case timing, resolutions, damages, remedies, and findings. Our case set covers two major areas of law: consumer finance and unfair or deceptive trade practices. Consumer finance includes litigation over debt collection, credit reporting, truth in lending practices, and other related state and federal statutes. Unfair or deceptive trade practices cover federal and state statutes involving fraud, deception, abuse of consumer information, government enforcement actions, and consumer privacy.
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), Fair Credit Report Act (FCRA), Truth in Lending Act (TILA), Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), FTC / CFPB Enforcement, and Unfair / Deceptive Trade Practices
Statutory Damages, Enhanced / Trebled Damages, Compensatory Damages, Punitive Damages, Restitution, Civil Money Penalties, Settled Claim Damages, and Approved Class Action Settlement
Consumer Protection Litigation Report
This report is a comprehensive overview of trends and insights for making strategic litigation decisions.
How Can You Apply Legal Analytics?
Set litigation strategy: What are your chances of success with a motion for summary judgment in a FDCPA case; how often and how long does it take for a court to rule on class certification; what arguments have been successful in making claims for lack of standing; what strategies work when making, or defending, a claim for civil money penalties?
Venue and judicial analysis: The most prevalent districts for consumer protection litigation look different depending on which causes of action are being asserted within the case. For cases involving the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Truth in Lending Act, the most active district is the Central District of California. Whereas, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act cases were filed most often in the Eastern District of New York.
Competitive intelligence: Evaluate your opposing counsel, including their prior cases, to see their typical playbook, anticipate their motion and case strategies, and then set the best course of action based on your analysis of their trial, settlement and motion strategy. Are they real fighters or imposters?
Early case assessment: Determine in two clicks the threat level, how long a case may take, and what the likely outcome is. Find out which lawyers and law firms are experienced in the first stages of consumer protection litigation, and which lawyers have taken a case all the way to trial.
Industry trending: Gain insights into consumer protection trends, damage awards, timing and settlement patterns in consumer protection litigation or among a select group of peers or competitors. In one click, see the law firms with the most experience in consumer protection litigation and perform spot-checks for conflicts.
Select or evaluate your outside counsel: Compare the performance of select law firms in geographic areas, in areas of expertise, or before certain judges. Find the best counsel for your case, even if they aren’t in your sights, based on factors important to you and your case.