Legal Analytics for Trademark Litigation
Lex Machina’s Legal Analytics for Trademark Litigation enables attorneys and companies to make data-driven decisions about federal trademark case strategy and tactics. Now you can use quantified insights into the behavior of district court judges, opposing parties, and opposing counsel to gain competitive advantage in trademark litigation.
Lex Machina’s trademark data lets you analyze federal Lanham Act case timing, resolutions, damages, remedies, and findings. The trademark practice area includes cases with one or more claims under § 43 of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1125), including trademark infringement, false designation of origin, false advertising, trademark dilution, cybersquatting, or unfair competition.
Use Cases
Lex Machina helps you answer questions such as:
- How often do opposing counsel’s cases resolve with a settlement?
- Has my judge ever found there was willfulness or bad faith at summary judgment? What were the facts of that case?
- Which law firms have the most experience representing plaintiffs in mass counterfeiting suits? Did those firms take similar cases to trial?
- Has the opposing party ever received enhanced damages? If so, how much was the amount?
- Has my judge ever granted a motion to dismiss based on fair use?
Case Tags
Dilution, Cybersquatting, Mass Counterfeiting
Damages Categories
Statutory Damages, Actual Damages / Infringer’s Profits, Enhanced Damages, Mass Counterfeiter Default Damages, Other / Mixed Damages, Attorneys’ Fees / Costs, Prejudgment Interest
Findings
Ownership / Validity, Trademark Infringement / False Designation of Origin, Dilution, Cybersquatting, False Advertising, Willfulness / Bad Faith, License or Equitable Defense, Fair Use Defense
Remedies
Granted and Denied Permanent Injunction, Preliminary Injunction, and Temporary Restraining Order, Relinquish Domain Name, Cancellation of Registration