Patent Quality and Settlement Among Repeat Patent Litigants

Strength of the International Trade Commission as a Patent Venue

The United States International Trade Commission (“ITC”) is a relatively new player in patent enforcement. The ITC, an administrative agency, can exclude the importation of infringing products into the United States, and interest from patentees in obtaining such remedies has grown as of late. Yet, many practitioners and scholars postulate […]

By |2017-10-10T01:36:09-08:00March 2nd, 2011|Academic Articles|

A Structured Approach to Calculating Reasonable Royalties

A significant part of the problem with patent damage awards comes from the non-exclusive, fifteen-factor “Georgia-Pacific” test now taken as the gold standard for calculating reasonable royalty damages. Simply handing the question of reasonable royalty to the jury, without more, is not a recipe for precision in damages analysis. But […]

By |2017-10-10T01:36:28-08:00February 2nd, 2011|Academic Articles|

When Foreigners Infringe Patents: An Empirical Look at the Involvement of Foreign Defendants in Patent Litigation in the U.S.

This paper presents results from a multiple-year project concerned with the involvement of foreign (non-U.S.) entities in U.S. patent litigation. A comparison of data from 2004 and 2009 that cover 5,407 patent cases filed in U.S. federal district courts in those two years evidences an increase in the number of […]

By |2017-10-10T01:36:48-08:00January 29th, 2011|Academic Articles|

Inequitable Conduct Defense in Patent Litigation (2005-2010)

In a comprehensive study on the inequitable conduct defense, Lex Machina reports on inequitable conduct findings in federal district court patent litigation cases terminated between January 1, 2005 and May 31, 2010. The study covers pleadings, summary judgment, trial, post-trial, and appellate events and analyzes event phase and termination data.

By |2017-10-10T01:37:13-08:00January 15th, 2011|Reports|

Are patent pools a way to help patent owners enforcing their rights?

This paper explores empirically the interplay between patent pooling and litigations using data on 1564 essential U.S. patents belonging to 8 different pools and a control database with patents having the same characteristics. We investigate two main questions. We first assess whether the introduction in a pool fosters the patents’ […]

By |2017-10-10T01:37:55-08:00December 13th, 2010|Academic Articles|

Where to File Your Patent Case

Forum shopping is alive and well in patent law. The patent venue statute allows plaintiffs to file suit anywhere in the country where the defendant’s product is sold or used. Despite the existence of a unified court of appeals that hears virtually all patent cases, patent plaintiffs – and those […]

By |2017-10-10T01:38:16-08:00October 27th, 2010|Academic Articles|

An Offensive Weapon? An Empirical Analysis of the ‘Sword’ of State Sovereign Immunity in State-Owned Patents

In 1999, the Supreme Court invoked state sovereign immunity to strike down provisions in the patent and trademark laws purporting to hold states liable for the infringement of these intellectual properties. These decisions ignited a series of criticisms, including allegations that sovereign immunity gives states an unfair advantage in the […]

By |2017-10-10T01:38:47-08:00October 14th, 2010|Academic Articles|
Go to Top