From De Novo Review to Informal Deference: An Historical, Empirical, and Normative Analysis of the Standard of Appellate Review for Patent Claim Construction

From De Novo Review to Informal Deference: An Historical, Empirical, and Normative Analysis of the Standard of Appellate Review for Patent Claim Construction

Patent scope plays a central role in the operation of the patent system, making patent claim construction a critical aspect of just about every patent litigation. With the resurgence of patent jury trials in the 1980s, the allocation of responsibility for interpreting patent claims between trial judge and jury emerged […]

By |2017-10-09T23:28:54-08:00October 5th, 2012|Academic Articles|

Startups and Patent Trolls

The America Invents Act requires the study of the positive and negative effects of patent assertion entities (“PAEs”) on the economy. This report provides one account of these impacts, as they are experienced by young technology companies. How patent demands impact startups is critical because they are a vital source […]

By |2017-10-09T23:29:21-08:00September 14th, 2012|Academic Articles|

An Empirical Study of Certain Settlement- Related Motions for Vacatur in Patent Cases

Patent cases are well-suited for detailed empirical investigations because of the availability of specialized databases, such as the Stanford IP Litigation Clearinghouse (IPLC) … See http://www.law.stanford.edu/program/centers/iplc. The IPLC is presently operated by a private company, Lex Machina, Inc. (https://lexmachina.com) in Palo Alto, California. The dataset for the empirical study reported […]

By |2017-10-09T23:30:11-08:00August 16th, 2012|Academic Articles|

Neutral Litigants in Patent Cases

Patent cases at the district court level are one of the most contentious forms of litigation. Scorched-earth litigation tactics, which include protracted discovery battles and overly aggressive motion practice, are common. Overzealous advocacy is not only costly to the parties but also burdens the courts and undermines the public interest […]

By |2017-10-09T23:30:33-08:00August 14th, 2012|Academic Articles|

Software Patents and the Return of Functional Claiming

Commentators have observed for years that patents do less good and cause more harm in the software industry than in other industries such as pharmaceuticals. Software patents create thickets of overlapping inventions, and are asserted in droves by patent trolls against innovative companies. Some have argued that software isn?t the […]

By |2017-10-09T23:30:56-08:00July 25th, 2012|Academic Articles|

The International Trade Commission and Patent Disputes

The International Trade Commission (ITC) is an integral part of the American patent system. Although it can only block imports on behalf of domestic industries, now that most technology products are manufactured abroad and Congress has relaxed the domestic industry requirement, nearly every patentee is a potential ITC complainant and […]

By |2017-10-09T23:31:41-08:00July 18th, 2012|Academic Articles|

Reforming Patents

While many believe the patent system has hit a historic and unprecedented low, discontent with patents, and in particular with software patents, is nothing new. In 1966, a Presidential Commission recommended prohibiting software patents because of the PTO’s inability to vet them. In 1883, the Supreme Court railed against “speculative […]

By |2017-10-09T23:32:06-08:00June 6th, 2012|Academic Articles|

Injunctions as More (or Less) than “Off Switches”: Patent-Infringement Injunctions’ Scope

Injunctions have often been viewed as mere “off switches” that prevent future violations of rights protected by so-called property rules. But injunctions in fact come in a variety of forms having different objects, scopes, and degrees of effectiveness. In practical situations, an injunction might amount to little more than a […]

By |2017-10-09T23:33:56-08:00June 1st, 2012|Academic Articles|
Go to Top